Some time ago I had my complete Cosmetics sorted out. Everything is tested on animals, I've thrown away. So I just want to have anything to do and I would not support ! Each can decide for yourself, I do not want anyone to dictate what cosmetics to use. I can not at all. What I hate about anything is when one buys cosmetics just to brag about. In order to have a certain status! Hello? How small can the brain? I want to attack anyone, but I hope all is aware of what havoc it! I buy nothing, which I know that animals had to die for it, just so I can apply the product? No! For some time I use only products which I know they were NOT tested on animals, and lo and behold I still have both eyes, I did not get a rash, I still have all my hair .. nothing happened! Is it therefore necessary to support the whole shit just so we can assume that the product can not harm us? And not even for sure, because the animals anyway all react differently on it than we do! I do not think we would find ourselves well when someone was injected into the skin or what tilts in the eye just once just what to test. No certainly not!
How reckless and ruthless, it is the company to support the animal abuse it.
Please considering before you go to beauty picks . Makes you smart, and buy anything you please just because it looks chic on the shelf or to increase your status. If you're surrounded by people who respect the fact you should make you seriously considering!
 |
| necessary? |
concerns the not Tests on animals:
dm - Neither the drug store or its suppliers lead in the production and development of their products (eg Balea or Alverde ) on animals. The products are tested by independent laboratories on human volunteers.
p2 Cosmetics - The discount brand tested only by means of patch test (= Testing of allergy skin tests ) and attach to their products no animal ingredients.
Paul Mitchell - The products of the hair stylists, sowie ihre Inhaltsstoffe, sind durchweg nicht an Tieren getestet. Dies versichert der Hersteller auch auf seiner Verpackung.
Dr. Scheller - Der Konzern bestätigt, dass die gewerbsmäßig in Verkehr gebrachten Produkte der Manhattan-Reihe nicht an Tieren getestet wurden. Die Hautverträglichkeit wird unter anderem mittels Epicutantest von Haut- und Augenärzten überprüft. Die Firma sagt aus, dass sie sich an der aktuellen Gesetzgebung orientiert, nach welcher das Tierversuchsverbot erst Ende 1997 auf alle kosmetischen Produkte und 2001 auf alle Rohstoffe erweitert wurde. Mit zur Dr. Scheller-Pallette gehören die Firmen Manhattan, durodont, Premium Cosmetics und bei ALDI vertreten durch Friscodent und Lacura.
Astor (von Coty) - Die Astor-Produkte der Firma Coty sind laut Konzernaussage nicht an Tieren getestet. Das sagt allerdings nichts über die restliche Produktpalette von Coty aus.
Weitere bekannte Firmen, die der Tierschutzorganisation Peta schriftlich zugesichtert haben, keine Tierversuche für ihre Produkte und Inhaltsstoffe durchzuführen:
Avon, Annemarie Börlind, Chanel, Clarins, Clinique, Donna Karan, Estée Lauder, M.A.C. Cosmetics, Nu Skin, Revlon, Tommy Hilfiger
concerns the continue test on animals :
L'Oreal - As the world's largest cosmetics company sees the Group's responsibility Leaders of alternative test methods to be. For over 20 years worked in the L'Oreal laboratories to develop non-animal testing, since 1989, will complete testing on animals of finished cosmetic products - only the finished products! The Group confirms, however, new raw materials from other manufacturers in animal experiments zu testen.
Dies gilt auch für sämtliche Tochterunternehmen, wie z.B. Biotherm, Diesel, Garnier, Armani, Helena Rubinstein, Kerastase, LancomeMaybelline, Redken, Vichy, Viktor & Rolf, Ralph Lauren, La Roche-Posay.
Zwar erhielten L'Oreal-Forscher kürzlich den "Prix Amalthée", verliehen vom französischen Tierschutzbund, welcher jedoch aufgrund der Tatsache, dass Rohstoffe an Tieren getestet werden, an Glaubwürdigkeit verliert.
Beiersdorf - Der Hersteller von Nivea und Co. hat sich gegen die Durchführung von Tierversuchen bei seinen Produkten ausgesprochen. Die Kosmetika werden u.a. tested on cell cultures and human volunteers. However, like Beiersdorf not give up the testing of raw materials on animals.
Henkel - The manufacturer of Schwarzkopf "3-weather taffeta or Poly Swing confirmed to seek alternative test methods and those already partially applied. However, he does animal testing still to be essential.
Procter & Gamble - The animal rights activists of the '90s, launched scandals of unscrupulous animal testing of Group performed well their effect: Procter & Gamble reported to have invested in recent years, $ 150 million in the development of alternative test methods. Apparently this is not enough, because the company has the animal testing is still a necessary process for the manufacture of cosmetics.
I hope I could help you a bit.
Sabby
0 comments:
Post a Comment